The Mars PrizeThe Mars Prize is a prize competition to award the winners of “best court case submissions” (pleadings in the form of written memorials) in a moot (imagined) court of arbitration, concerning a dispute between:
*** MARS REGISTER v. UN COPUOS ***
** THE MARS LAND CLAIM DISPUTE **
The competition is based on the ‘actual’ Mars Land Claim submitted by Mars Register to the UN and UK/US Governments. It is open to law students or post-graduates (with an interest in general international law and int’l space law). We at Mars Register are not professional lawyers (we’re medically trained), so we have benefitted from expert legal counsel in composing The Mars Land Claim and have agreed a world class judging panel of two senior academic scholars of international space law: Prof. Fabio Tronchetti and Dr Philip De Man.
Prize for best memorial (claimant) = $1000 *
Prize for best memorial (respondent)=$500 *
First 500 valid applications will be awarded with a “Standard Mars Land Claim” certificate, claiming 25-100 sq km of land on planet Mars.
The Mars Prize Certificate (small size sample).
The Mars Prize: Best Memorial (Claimant): $1000 *
This prize goes to the best pleading document (memorial) submitted as claimant (or applicant), Mars Register.
The Mars Prize: Best Memorial (Respondent): $500 *
This prize goes to the best pleading document (memorial) submitted as respondent, UN COPUOS
Award of Mars Land Claim Certificate for 25-100 Sq Km
The first 500 acceptable submissions (not trivial or “ridiculously poor” in quality / content) will be awarded this.
* The Mars Prize will be quite heavily promoted via international and national media including social media.
Why the disparity in prize money? … Well, we think the claimant here (MarsRegister = us) has a rather more difficult job than the respondent. Dont get me wrong, we think we are going to smash this thing when it comes to the REAL “due process” which is looming in the next year…. but it will need a pleading of ultra high quality. We are likely to get some inspiration from the memorials submitted. We are also most interested to imagine the various ways the respondent (COPUOS) may approach this case.